Hatteras Yachts to Build 95 Raised Pilothouse Megayacht

Complementing its existing 80 Motor Yacht and 100 Motor Yacht models, Hatteras Yachts will launch a 95 Raised Pilothouse megayacht next summer.

Measuring 100 feet LOA (30.5 meters), the 95 Raised Pilothouse will be Hatteras’ new flagship. She’ll be the first of a new generation of motoryachts for the American builder. Jim Meyer, president and CEO of Hatteras Yachts, says the 95 Raised Pilothouse embraces the large-yacht feel without the higher price tag or larger crew complement that go along with 100-foot-plus megayachts. This way, he adds, existing clients with 80 Motor Yachts can step up in size more easily. In addition, Meyer says, the 95 Raised Pilothouse will help introduce Hatteras to additional markets, like South America, Australia, and China.

To address the cruising needs of these and other markets, the 95 Raised Pilothouse will feature a side entry. She’ll also have a spiral staircase just steps away, much like larger megayachts. The standard layout will feature the full-beam master suite below decks, accompanied by three guest staterooms. However, buyers have the option of placing the master on the main deck and adding a fourth guest cabin below. Given the 95

Raised Pilothouse’s 22’6” (6.9-meter) beam, it’s easy to imagine the option being popular. Either way, crew quarters are fully aft, with access via a transom door or aft-deck stairs.
It’s also easy to imagine a variety of layouts for the flying bridge. Hatteras’ in-house design team is making furnishings and features that can be mixed and matched. These include as a dining table, sunlounges, and a wetbar.

What won’t change is Hatteras’ turnkey approach. “Everything from Zero-Speed stabilizers, bow and stern thrusters, and a premium A/V system to a stocked wine cooler, bath robes, and linens are included,” Meyer explains. Owners will further receive an electronics allowance to select helm electronics that suit their cruising needs. Power-wise, they’ll have a choice between twin 1,900-hp Caterpillar C32 ACERTs and 2,600-hp MTU 16V2000 CR diesels. The Caterpillars should provide a top speed of 25 knots and a cruise speed of 19 knots. The MTUs kick the figures up a bit: 29 and 24 knots, respectively.

The Sinking of Yogi: Stop the Speculation

PHOTO: Hellenic Coast Guard

Last Friday news spread quickly about the sudden sinking of Yogi in Greece. Dozens of websites both within and outside of the yachting industry have been reporting the news since then. Unfortunately, as is often the case in situations like this, incorrect reports have been published and assumptions have been made. In this editor’s opinion, the speculation needs to stop—now.

First, the facts according to the Hellenic Coast Guard. The 204-foot (60.2-meter) Yogi was 19 nautical miles off the coast of Skyros, Greece, early Friday morning when the captain contacted the Coast Guard. He reported that Yogi had suffered mechanical failure, was unmanageable due to the weather conditions, and was flooding. Eight individuals, all crew and including himself, were aboard. As for the weather conditions, the Coast Guard reports that they were Force 8, a gale with winds between 34 and 40 knots and seas of 18 to 25 feet (5.5 to 7.5 meters). Two rescue helicopters were dispatched, as were additional Coast Guard vessels. A Navy frigate and four commercial vessels in the area also responded. Video footage shot from one of the Coast Guard helicopters shows all eight people aboard the megayacht were in survival suits on an upper deck when rescue operations began, and Yogi was on her starboard side. The Coast Guard states it took a little over an hour to safely get everyone off the yacht. They were then taken ashore for medical evaluation.

Another fact, from Proteksan Turquoise, which delivered Yogi in 2011: Yogi had been at its yard in Turkey just prior to the accident for repaint work under warranty. (Some news reports have indicated the warranty work involved the interior.)

Last fact, at this point: The cause of the sinking remains under investigation.

Naturally, whenever an event such as a superyacht’s sinking occurs, there is going to be speculation. Unfortunately, some yachting industry representatives have gone on the record, questioning the construction and even the crew. Are these valid questions? When there’s no first-hand knowledge of the build or the accident, publicly pointing fingers at a yard, a design, or any related aspect sheds no light on the situation. Equally disconcerting is the approach taken by some media, in what can only be assumed to be a misguided attempt at humor, and/or a desire for higher readership. “Superyacht Sinks Like a Stone in the Mediterranean,” read one headline. Worse, another journalist commented on the high- and low-season charter rates: “regarding the lower price, could it be the extra $28,000 for the option of keeping the boat upright throughout the voyage?” Interestingly, that statement remained online for three days and was pulled yesterday afternoon, after two people, including this editor, took the journalist to task for being out of line. She replied to this editor by saying it was a good point… but had a most puzzling explanation as to why she ever made it in the first place: “The shock that these supposedly new, modern, big ships and yachts are still so frail in the face of the sea – and that no amount of money can buy safety – was my point and not well made.” (Also changed are the five comments made prior to the edits… they are all now deleted.)

Since the causes of the mechanical failure and flooding are still unknown, we’d all do well to await the investigation’s results. Proteksan Turquoise’s representatives, as well as the insurer and others, are speaking with the captain and crew.

We also would all do well to simply thank the Hellenic Coast Guard and the operators of the other vessels for responding in the most professional manner possible. Without them, this tragedy would be far more unthinkable.

Former Presidential Yacht Williamsburg in Woeful, but Hopeful, State

PHOTO: Carlo Martinelli/TheYachtPhoto.com

The USS Williamsburg, one of the largest and most famous megayachts built in the 20th century, is rusting away at a shipyard in Italy, where she has been for nearly two decades, untouched. The photo above was taken within the past few weeks. Despite her appearance, and despite an anticipated restoration cost in the nine-figure range, there’s still interest in acquiring her and restoring her.

Bert Laacks, a broker with Florida-based Lloyds Yacht and Ship, holds the central listing, with Williamsburg for sale for 8.8 million euros (about $11.6 million). Laacks was hired by Navalmare, the shipyard in La Spezia where Williamsburg currently lies, to sell her. Some brokerage listings state the anticipated restoration costs are at least 33 million euros (about $43.54 million), but Laacks says that figure is about three to four years old. In today’s economy, he says, the cost would be more like 100 million euros (about $131.94 million).

Contrary to what you might expect given the global economic situation, Laacks says he has talked with some serious potential buyers. The U.S. Navy’s Presidential yacht historian, Kim Nielsen, confirms this. His office is part of the Naval History and Heritage Command at the Washington Navy Yard in Washington, D.C. Furthermore, Nielsen has a personal connection to Wiliamsburg. He was the project manager for an anticipated restoration over a decade ago. His office has the original naval architecture plans, which he and Laacks have shown to potential buyers. Those buyers have even gone so far as to commission surveys, Nielsen says, showing that Williamsburg is still structurally sound. This, in combination with Williamsburg’s history, has allowed potential buyers able to see past the rust that covers nearly every inch of her 243-foot (74-meter) length.

As for that history, Williamsburg was launched in 1930 at Bath Iron Works, as a private yacht named Aras. Pictured above, she was an impressive sight, bearing a black hull with a 36-foot beam and 14-foot draft (11 meters and 4.3 meters, respectively). The steel-hulled megayacht was commissioned by Hugh Chisholm, a paper and railroad magnate from Maine. Aras (“Sara” spelled backwards) was the third same-named yacht had Chisholm built, and he and his family cruised aboard her every summer until war service called. Aras was acquired by the U.S. Navy in April 1941 and converted into a gunboat from October to December of that same year. The Navy renamed her Williamsburg. Williamsburg departed U.S. waters for her first official tour of duty on December 6, 1941—coincidentally, the day before the attacks on Pearl Harbor. From that point to June 1945, Williamsburg saw service mostly in Iceland. That summer, the vessel was intended to be converted into an amphibious force flagship, a floating command post from which further water-based attacks would be coordinated. However, upon Japan’s surrender, the conversion was cancelled. Instead, Williamsburg was converted back into a yacht, setting course for Washington, D.C. in November to replace the Presidential yacht Potomac.

While Williamsburg was the Presidential yacht for both Harry S. Truman and Dwight D. Eisenhower, President Eisenhower preferred his farm retreat in Pennsylvania. President Truman, meanwhile, spent abundant time onboard. Indeed, the Harry S. Truman Library & Museum has dozens upon dozens of photographs of President Truman onboard. Some show him hosting dignitaries such as Winston Churchill. Others show him simply enjoying the sights from her decks, or wrapping himself in a robe after a swim, his wet footprints visible on the teak.

President Eisenhower decommissioned Williamsburg in 1953, and she was given to the Potomac River Naval Command for continued maintenance. The National Science Foundation acquired her in 1962, converting her into an oceanographic research vessel. This required the removal of the Presidential staterooms and other luxury touches, replaced by a lab and an aquarium. The re-christened Anton Bruun served scientists and researchers alike from around the world until 1968.

Anton Bruun was set for acquisition by the government of India later that same year, but misfortune lay just over the horizon. She was undergoing repairs in a floating drydock when the platform supporting her suddenly sank. She was a total loss, so the government auctioned her. A company in New Jersey acquired her to serve as a restaurant. She remained in that capacity for a few years, and in 1979 a Washington, D.C. company bought her and towed her into town for the same purpose. Plans fell through, however, and Williamsburg was abandoned, lying alongside a sewage treatment plant. A few years later, a group knowledgeable about her history decided she deserved rescuing, forming the USS Williamsburg Preservation Society in 1985. The goal was to publicize Williamsburg’s plight and find a buyer to set things right. Some reports state that the Society acquired Williamsburg, but it never attempted to buy her nor raised funds to do so. It acted, and still acts, as a conduit of information, part of the non-profit Historic Naval Ships Association. It took seven years, but the Society’s efforts worked: The USS Williamsburg Corporation stepped forward in 1992, pledging to fund a $65-million refit and restoration of Williamsburg as a boutique charter yacht.

PHOTO: Carlo Martinelli/TheYachtPhoto.com

The USS Williamsburg Corporation selected Valdettaro Shipyard in La Spezia, Italy to carry out the work. Williamsburg made her way from U.S. shores to Europe in 1994. The photo above shows her in La Spezia shortly thereafter. Now, things finally started looking up… except they were actually about to get a lot worse.

According to Nielsen, the shipyard owner suddenly disappeared—along with all the money. With all sorts of payments going unmade by the yard, the Italian courts placed it and its assets, including Williamsburg, into receivership. The craftsmen at the yard wanted to carry out the restoration, Nielsen says, they couldn’t afford to buy the facility. Neither, he adds, could the USS Williamsburg Corporation afford to take back the yacht. The Italian courts therefore sold her, with Navalmare, conveniently located across the bay, being granted possession. Navalmare had been husbanding Williamsburg during the court proceedings, so it was a natural choice.

According to some reports, at some point between Navalmare’s acquisition and 1998, the shipyard planned to scrap Williamsburg. However, Nielsen disputes this. “They assumed, rightfully so, that she has far more historical value and shouldn’t be scrapped,” he says. He adds that Navalmare has been looking after the yacht ever since then, making sure she remains upright.

Even with the sad situation that has befallen Williamsburg, Laacks believes there’s a buyer who will restore her. Nielsen puts it this way: “Williamsburg is the last unrestored yacht of the period…and the only unrestored Presidential yacht.” (The three other former Presidential yachts still in existence are Honey Fitz, Potomac, and Sequoia, all in private hands.) Laacks says that Navalmare would be interested in undertaking the restoration if a sale occurs.

If an American steps forward to acquire Williamsburg and return her to use in U.S. waters, that could be problematic, due to the Jones Act. The Jones Act requires, among other things, that vessels carrying goods between U.S. ports be constructed in the United States. Then again, special Congressional exemptions have been granted in the past (think Limitless, which flies the American flag).

One way or the other, something tells us this story is far from being over.